Talk:canine distemper virus

canine distemper virus
the viral agent that causes canine distemper. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * That is not the complete meaning of the term, it is its etymology. As with many vernacular names for organisms, it corresponds to a particular proper noun in taxonomy. It has a generally accepted abbreviation that is in fairly common, though specialized use. It is probably lexical only in the context of veterinary pathology, but we have many, many thousands of entries that have an SoP meaning that is close to and the source of a meaning that is not SoP in a specialized, often technical context. DCDuring TALK 11:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, this virus name is retained, at least tentatively, when it is found in other mammals (lions, ferrets, raccoons, stoats, etc), though the illness is not called canine distemper. DCDuring TALK 11:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the entry should be moved to Canine distemper virus, following the s orthography. DCDuring TALK 18:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm very sceptical that the term is translingual., for example, turns up exactly one hit of the term used in French. That search does turn up enough hits of the term used in English to refer to the virus in hamsters and other animals to suggest that you're right that the virus is still called "canine distemper virus" even when it's found in non-canids, but I'm not sure that lends it any idiomaticity, since it's still "the virus that causes canine distemper". (Compare: many "red cars" have silver hubcaps, black or beige or grey seats, etc; their failure to be entirely red does not make "red car" idiomatic.) The point that this is the specific common name for a particular taxonomically identifiable virus is more suggestive of idiomaticity, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 19:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * This or the capitalized, ICTV form is a no-brainer as to idiomaticity. It is part of a nomenclature system. Virus naming often adopts English customary names as the formal names of species. As to use in French see this Google Scholar search and German see |CDV+hund+-interaktionen+-infected&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&as_ylo=1980&as_yhi=2014 this one. The yield of valid cites is not too high, so patience or an RfV is required to get definite results. DCDuring TALK 20:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * See also [[talk:tobacco mosaic virus]]. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * RFD kept as no consensus for deletion (1 pro-keep argument by DCDuring, 1 delete by the nominator, 1 undecided by -sche). --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)