Talk:carbon nanotube

RFD discussion: July–August 2017
Does it quality to have an entry? Yurivict (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I would keep this, but I find the reasoning hard to put into words. I suppose it is a translation target for single-word foreign equivalents, and a synonym for the existing buckytube. bd2412 T 16:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Carbon nanotubes were the original nanotubes, so it is possible that the term predates the independent term, in which case I would keep. Otherwise it is probably SOP, there are lots of specific nanotubes. -  [The] DaveRoss  11:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Wyang (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * RFD kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)