Talk:carpus

RFV discussion: August 2021–June 2022
Latin: “, ”. Tagged by 2003:DE:3720:3796:C417:65D5:8E69:E298 today, not listed:
 * “Not in the alledged "References":
 * L&S & Gaffiot have, a proper name; Meißner & Auden don't have it at all.”
 * L&S & Gaffiot have, a proper name; Meißner & Auden don't have it at all.”
 * L&S & Gaffiot have, a proper name; Meißner & Auden don't have it at all.”
 * L&S & Gaffiot have, a proper name; Meißner & Auden don't have it at all.”

J3133 (talk) 10:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * According to etymonline.com, it is Modern Latin (1670s), so should have no place in these dictionaries. Some 17th-century uses:, , . --Lambiam 13:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

cited This, that and the other (talk) 03:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

RFV-passed This, that and the other (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)