Talk:cephalophus

RFV discussion: April–November 2019
Any use in running Latin text? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I saw 0 Latin results searching at google books for "cephalopham", "cephalopho", "cephalophae", "cephalophus haec", "cephalophum haec", "cephalophus sunt", "cephalophum sunt", and by time it would be RFV failed already. (There's cephalophora/Cephalophora.) --Marontyan (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * RFV deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)