Talk:cess path

cess path
A handful of web hits --Crowdpleaser 11:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Appears valid, as you could readily have determined yourself. Interestingly, seems to have entered common use only in Australia:, ,, and to have shown much less uptake than related terms like "cess heave." -- Visviva 12:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please be mindful that Crowdpleaser is a sockpuppet of the original editor - aka Wonderfool. See also several above. Many sysops should by now be able to spot Wonderool's edits without having to ask for a CheckUser. SemperBlotto 12:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * How can you tell? What signs are there to look out for? † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 13:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That information should not be made available here, as Wonderfool patrols recent edits, keeping his head down until he has a batch of updates. Email is the best way to discuss him, as he is also sometimes present on IRC. SemperBlotto 13:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * However, look at the next entry below this. Who made the original entry and what was the edit summary. What does that tell you about user:BreadCrust? SemperBlotto 13:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * How easy is it to block him from IRC? --Common noun 13:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You should also keep an eye on accounts that are created within minutes or one of his being blocked e.g. "Common noun" SemperBlotto 13:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Back to this RFV, for a moment...the three "citations" Visviva provide are all hyphenated. This looks like an "rfvfailed" as those were not deemed worthy of adding to the entry?  --Connel MacKenzie 17:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)