Talk:chó hoang châu Phi

RFV discussion: December 2019–January 2023
Plenty of hits online but only one Google Books hit, namely this, which appears to be a children's picture book teaching them English words + Vietnamese translation. (The book is seen here, not a context where the word would be in running text.)

As Vietnamese is a WDL, we need 3 durably archived occurences in running text. Another of my own created entries that I'm reporting. --Corsicanwarrah (talk) 12:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Here are some uses on what look to me like news sites:, , , . My Vietnamese does not suffice to verify if they are durably archived. --Lambiam 15:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Cited using those sources. 70.172.194.25 20:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

CFI-mandated discussion

 * Ends January 16, 2023, 23:59 (UTC)

Should these Internet citations be considered valid? Our current WT:CFI policy allows for the community to decide on a case-by-case basis whether or not Internet sources are enough attestation for a term. 70.172.194.25 20:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * . 70.172.194.25 22:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * {| cellspacing="0" style="width:250px;background:#FFE0E8"


 * style="width:45px;background:#FFB3B3;text-align:center;font-size:14pt" | vi-0
 * style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em;" | Người này không thể đánh giá các trang web Việt Nam. Lambiam 22:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * }

RFV-passed nem con. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)