Talk:chinensis

taurus
These are just Latin words used in specific epithets, and thus as Translingual entries, they are duplications of the Latin entries. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment As they are used in several different unrelated species, then, wouldn't they have been borrowed into transligual, instead of individual instances of use in a translingual term? -- 70.51.201.106 22:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment several of the Latin entries have several senses listed, while the translingual term only pertains to one of them, so not the same, as the translingual use is not all uses in the Latin use. -- 70.51.201.106 23:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * "hircus" -- the translingual use is not for a male goat, as a species use it is unrelated to the gender of the goat, so not the same. -- 70.51.201.106 22:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * "taurus" -- the translingual use is not for a bull, as a species use it is unrelated to the gender of the bovine, so not the same. -- 70.51.201.106 22:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: specific epithets shouldn’t have a translingual entry. They are just Latin. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 23:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * RFD deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)