Talk:cis person

It should be deleted it is a neologism2602:306:C4B4:F390:A113:88A7:8C8C:7F98 06:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Please use WT:RFV (, not ) if you doubt that it meets criteria for inclusion; however, note that a quick search on Google Books and Google Scholar shows it to be amply attested, meeting the criteria for inclusion. - -sche (discuss) 06:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * (It's arguably a transparent "sum of parts", but it is apparently shoehorned in by WT:COALMINE because the unspaced form is also attestable.) - -sche (discuss) 06:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)