Talk:client enablement

client enablement
Entry that would need a great amount of cleaning up. If there were a definition, it would seen to be SoP as it seems to relate to the enablement of one or more clients. DCDuring TALK 18:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The original contributor claims that this is used as a job title. If that's correct we should keep it. We have earlier decided to keep basketball player, football player etc. after an rfd discussion because in addition to SoP sense they are also professions. --Hekaheka 23:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see an agent suffix on it. It seems not like a profession or a job title but an area of responsibility. If you think it is not deletable per se, then it should go to RfV. DCDuring TALK 04:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I did not find any evidence for "client enablement" being a job title either, but I thought we should give the original contributor an opportunity to show his. On the other hand this term seems to exist and I don't think its meaning is evident from the parts. It's obvious that the client is enabled to do something, but is any customer involvement "client enablement"? IBM has put a "Client Enablement Guide" in the net. They seem to think that the term means letting the customer do part of the work which used to be done by their sales personnel. But is any self-service also "customer enablement" or does it have a more specific meaning? Even if it doesn't, it may be entry-worthy in order to explain to the uninformed (of which I'm one) that it is just a fancy term for self-service. --Hekaheka 09:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If it were a euphemism for self-service, that might be entry-worthy. DCDuring TALK 13:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)