Talk:co-parents-in-law

RFC discussion: November 2014–November 2017
— Ungoliant (falai) 22:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Is there any reason why this should have the plural as lemma? The singular is attested;
 * 2) the second definition needs rewording. It’s not “the relationship ” but “people having the relationship ” (I can’t think of a way of doing it elegantly);
 * 3) looking at, it seems the most common use is in translating languages that have a single word for this. Is this worth mentioning in the usage notes? Or maybe a context label like chiefly anthropology and linguistics.
 * Not AFAICT.
 * It does.
 * Both usage notes and context label may be warranted, as they indicate different aspects of usage. DCDuring TALK 14:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I removed the second definition, singularized the lemma, and TTBC'd a few things. --Spreaderofwords (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)