Talk:common-technology

RFV
See Requests for verification archive/2012. - -sche (discuss) 09:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February–March 2012
Four separate "senses" suggest it's just a sum of parts, any combination of the two words. Entry created by the word's creator, who was cheeky enough to cite himself as a reference. Plus the hyphenation looks wrong for a noun. Equinox ◑ 16:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * What surprises me is that it seems to have survived EncycloPetey's hawkeye. Still, I don't think this entry provides any value. --Hekaheka 20:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This, phoneography and optilexia above all sound like absolute tosh to me. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 07:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)