Talk:common law

RFV discussion: March–June 2014
Two senses seem problematic. One appears to be defining "common law system" and the other "common law jurisdiction". Should these senses really appear under common law on its own? Equinox ◑ 16:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed: the senses define "common law system" and "common law jurisdiction" rather than "common law". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)


 * RFV failed: no attesting quotations provided. And the defs did not even make sense as defining "common law" rather than "common law system" and "common law jurisdiction". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)