Talk:compræhensive

RFV
I tried: compraehensive, comprxhensive, comprrehensive, comprsehensive, comprashensive, comprarhensive, comprœhensive, compræhenfive, compraehenfive, comprrehenfive, comprsehenfive, comprashenfive, comprarhenfive, comprxhenfive, compriehensive, comprjehensive, comprjehenfive, compriehenfive and none of them turned up any relevant results. --Æ&#38;Œ (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It's an inconsistent spelling, as æ often replaces a, not e! Could be just a total error. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It could charitably be viewed as hypercorrection, as if many uses of "e" in modern spellings of Latin-derived words were improper alterations of "ae". Or it is intended as an intentional archaicism. The valid ones are fine, though it seems to me we've overemphasized them. This one seems quite unsupportable in English, though Lewis and Short does show compraehendo as an alternative spelling of comprehendo. DCDuring TALK 18:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake; English pre is from Latin prae. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Uncited in over three months; deleted. —Angr 10:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)