Talk:conceptual model

RFC discussion: March 2017
Unclear, repetitive wording, perhaps SoP. Equinox ◑ 19:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: April–August 2020
"A model that is represented by concepts or related concepts formed after a conceptualization process in the mind." The last part ("formed...") seems entirely redundant since being formed in the mind is always part of a concept. The rest is SoP. Equinox ◑ 19:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Is the RfD process now also required for removing redundant parts of definitions? I must say, after removing this, the definition remains opaque. In practice it appears to mean a model represented by a picture consisting of an assemblage of text balloons connected by arrows for which it remains mysterious what they represent, reminiscent of a conspiracy theorist’s pin-up board. --Lambiam 20:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I propose deletion of the entry; I said "the rest is SoP". Equinox ◑ 20:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, Delete. If this is entry-worthy by dint of having an idiomatic meaning, whoever is up to the task will be better off by having a fresh start. I looked at the, but apart from trivialities it is mostly blather and hot air. --Lambiam 10:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Useless. Mihia (talk) 00:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 20:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)