Talk:coniugatio

RFC discussion: May 2019–December 2021
Coniugatio is listed as an alternative form of conjugatio. Shouldn't it be the other way around? (At least that's how it is on other Latin lemmas with the letter "j", correct me if I'm missing something.) Johnny Shiz (talk) 22:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Open for soon 3 years. --Fytcha (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I think so. states: “The distinction between I and J only appears post-Classical Latin. When attested, entries for forms using the J should use  or  to point to the non-J spelling.” I interpret this as the non-J spelling always being the main entry, and definitely so for terms attested in Classical Latin (which includes the word coniugatio, used by Cicero: Haec verborum coniugatio συζυγία dicitur, ... ). Note that  is accordingly listed as an alternative spelling of .  --Lambiam 13:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅. —Mahāgaja · talk 15:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)