Talk:converbialisation

RFV discussion: February–March 2023
Can't find this, but it's plausible. 70.172.194.25 05:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a slightly odd one. is definitely attestable (as well as its counterpart ), but  beats out both of them. On the other hand,  is very difficult to find anywhere - so I can understand why you've made this RFV.
 * Ultimately, I'm not sure how I'd feel about failing this, as it's just an instance of the / rule. It's certainly how I'd spell it if I were writing a transcript of someone saying it, for example. Theknightwho (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ultimately, I'm not sure how I'd feel about failing this, as it's just an instance of the / rule. It's certainly how I'd spell it if I were writing a transcript of someone saying it, for example. Theknightwho (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

No hits aside from. Same warning as above. Ioaxxere (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed. Ioaxxere (talk) 04:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)