Talk:cottonball

RFD discussion: September 2019–January 2020
This an exceedingly rare variant which I take to be a typo/misspelling rather than a distinct term. - TheDaveRoss  12:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Using Ngram Viewer cottonball does get off the bottom of the scale. DonnanZ (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Isn't rarity of variants an RFV issue? Purplebackpack89 21:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * RFD is basically a vote so we could get rid of the word dog if everyone agreed on it. But yeah I suppose the question is can we find some good citations that are unambiguously not typos/scannos. Equinox ◑ 21:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Kept No deletion votes other than nominator; no votes of any kind in four months. May be RfVed if desired. Purple</b><b style="color:#991C99">back</b><b style="color:#C3C">pack</b><b style="color:#FB0">89</b></b> 20:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: frequency ratio of 20 is not "exceedinly rare": . That would have to be at the very least 100 or even 500. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)