Talk:cuddy

Wikipedia has a Cuddy entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuddy

Should this Wiktionary entry be parallel?


 * I think the Wiktionary entry is fairly good as it is, though we could link to the Wikipedia article. Conrad.Irwin 17:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Requests for verification - kept
Kept. See archived discussion of August 2008. 06:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

RFV
Rfv-sense cuddly SemperBlotto 07:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I've tried the following Google Book searches: "cuddier", "cuddiest", "more cuddy", "most cuddy" and "is cuddy". These all get nothing relevant. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ¶ “so cuddy” and “feels cuddy” do not turn up relevant results either, and I have personally never seen this word in literature; this sense is also not on etymonline.com. ¶ I doubt anybody is goïng to worry if an informal form gets speedy‐deletion. --Pilcrow 20:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I finished the set with am/are/was/were/be/being cuddy. I supposed I missed "been cuddy" in that case. I'm gonna go out and a limb and say that will give me zero relevant hits. Oh but may as well give it 30 days, or else what is rfv for? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Deleted unverified. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)