Talk:culturoscientific

RFV discussion: December 2015–June 2016
I could only find one use, in the title of an article that was listed in a couple of places (the article itself is probably behind some paywall). Chuck Entz (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have added two entries to the citations page, but can't find a third. Kiwima (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There are more citations available for the hyphenated form, so I think we should have an entry at one or the other. Spinning Spark  18:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not so sure about that...hyphenated forms that are simply SOP don't seem worth entering, and the unhyphenated form does not have enough cites. Kiwima (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * SOP of what? There is no English word nor prefix . —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * "culture" + "o" (for combining form) + "scientific". Kiwima (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * We've never evaluated SOPpiness at the level of the bound morpheme, otherwise birds would be SOP as bird + -s. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 08:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure where this discussion is going, but I've added more cites of the hyphenated form. Note that the last one I put in (Libraries of the British Council) appears to be hyphenated only because the word is breaking across lines. Spinning Spark  22:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed: moved to culturo-scientific in line with the citations. Equinox ◑ 16:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)