Talk:dampne

RFV discussion: November 2013–July 2014
If this is found only in Chaucer, shouldn't it have a Middle English header? Either way it needs citations for English, Middle English, or both. --WikiTiki89 16:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It's pretty easy to cite. It's not so easy to tell when it died out and got replaced by damne/damn because a lot of the later attestations of dampne are just citing older works such as Chaucer. But it seems to be unambiguously citable until about 1550. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * We already have the Middle English at . Mglovesfun (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, what through me off was the request for a Chaucer quotation. I still think it needs citing as a Modern English word. --WikiTiki89 17:30, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Well oddly enough WT:CFI doesn't say the citations have to be in the entry, just three durably archived citations. Basically, there are plenty of citations just I can't be bothered to type them up. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It would help if you pointed us to them. Maybe give us a link or name an author? --WikiTiki89 00:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Here's two


 * Looks good. For future reference the dates of those are 1547 and 1535 respectively. --WikiTiki89 17:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Cited. I couldn’t find the dates of two of the citations, but one of them is by someone born after 1500, and the other is by, who became archbishop after 1500. — Ungoliant (falai) 22:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Passed. — Ungoliant (falai) 23:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)