Talk:date back

Do we need the "to"?
One citation has "dates back as far" General Vicinity (talk) 17:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Or "dates back 1000 years" General Vicinity (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK I boldly moved it. I think the redirect from date back to should stay. General Vicinity (talk)