Talk:datlash

Can a user with knowledge of Hebrew look at this? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

RFV discussion
Allegedly English. Two quotations are provided. The first may be good (I'd love to see it in print, to see whether it's italicized), but the second is a list of transliterations, not English words. The only bgc result is italicized (i.e., a transliteration). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * no useful hits on a ggc search either - two results that might be in this sense, one quoted so probably a mention rather than a use, and the other appears to be "datlashim", but neither are durably archived and neither are accessible to me so it's academic what sense they're in anyway. I've also done a google news archive search, btu all the uses are pay-per-view hits from the Jerusalem Post, and as that's where one of the existing two come from they wont show independence even if I could see them. Thryduulf (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry merged redirectlessly into Citations:datlash. —Ruakh TALK 02:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)