Talk:dead ball

dead ball
Rfv-sense: (cricket) An arm signal given by the umpire in certain circumstances when the ball becomes dead (arms crossed and re-crossed below the waist).

Is it appropriate and accurate to assign this name to a signal from the umpire? Should this be done for all signals made by people in various identifiable circumstances? A policeman giving a stop sign, should that be a definition of stop? __meco 20:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't think that there would be much usage of "dead ball" to refer to the signal as opposed to what was signified. This contrasts with "wave", "salute", "thumbs up", "red light". We could have at least three senses: the state of the ball, the determination by the umpire that the ball was in that state, the indication that the ball was in that state. And perhaps in professional sports, the official record that the ball was in that state. But that way madness lies, for most entries. DCDuring TALK 20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Here's a troublesome citation:
 * 2005, "Cricket for beginners", part IV, BBC News, Aug 26, 2005
 * In one of Australia's recent innings, the umpire gave a dead ball as the ball hit ....
 * That would seem to refer to the signal rather than the signified. I think I will leave this to the philosophers. DCDuring TALK 21:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe move to RFD as redundant to the first sense. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

from the entry:
 * 1)  An arm signal given by the umpire in certain circumstances when the ball becomes dead (arms crossed and re-crossed below the waist).