Talk:democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner

RFV discussion: August 2011–March 2012
Can this be attested? Just two hits on Google Books. ---&gt; Tooironic 01:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It can if one relaxes the search slightly to.
 * I don't know if we should consider it a proverb, which is the only basis for keeping it, unless we now just keep all metaphors. DCDuring TALK 02:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a "saying" more than anything else, and not even a particularly old one. See Democracy. bd2412 T 03:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that belongs on Wikiquote, not Wiktionary. — Robin 08:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Confer a camel is a horse designed by a committee. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree with DCDuring, I'm not sure we have a basis for keeping it, even if attested. - -sche (discuss) 01:08, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There will be cases where Wiktionary and Wikiquote content should overlap. This is not one of them. bd2412 T 15:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, hardly any of our proverbs have any significant political content. I'm not sure that political content is a fatal defect, but I think proverbs are generally accepted as true and not controversial or partisan (or sectarian, for that matter). DCDuring TALK 16:49, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, but 'relevance' is not an RFV issue, it's an RFD one. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Deleted. If you disagree, reopen the issue here or at WT:RFD. - -sche (discuss) 01:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * There's no basis for me to disagree, it was never attested per WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)