Talk:design critique

RFD discussion: August–September 2017
"A formal discussion of the good and bad points of a particular design". IMO "formal" is not enough to raise this above the SoP. Equinox ◑ 14:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * But it MIGHT be a translation target in some language. DCDuring (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * pls stay out of my RFD. Equinox ◑ 16:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Really? I can't express my uncertainty about this? DCDuring (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above is just an annoying post contributing nothing of substance to this discussion, and the same or similar form has now been used by the poster multiple times, unfortunately. I don't remember translation target supporters voting keep on an entry that has no actual translation. If someone wants to use the translation target/translation hub rationale, they have to do their homework and show what the interesting translations are. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)