Talk:dichotomic

RFC discussion: May 2012–September 2017
Since the creation of the entry by an anon in 2005, this entry has content now in Usage notes and External links that looks misplaced and probably excessive. Someone familiar with Dichotomic search might be able to salvage something and finish cleaning this up. DCDuring TALK 15:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I was bold and just removed all the links (except those in the definitions) and usage notes. They were all encyclopedic material. Still needs a decent pronunciation. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 04:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Looks good now--WF on Holiday (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)