Talk:digital inception

RFV discussion: September 2015–February 2016
I've tried to clean it up. Seems like a protologism. Can't even see anything much on the Web. Equinox ◑ 02:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I could find two citations: [] and [] Kiwima (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * And here's a third []


 * I don't believe any of the 3 citations supports the definition: e.g. "since its 2009 digital inception" simply means "since it was created, as an online/Internet thing, in 2009". Nothing to do with marketing techniques. Equinox ◑ 22:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The third one isn't durably archived and none of them seem to support this sense, which I imagine was itself made up for marketing purposes and the person who created it is linking here from a company website or something. We get quite a lot of this. Renard Migrant (talk) 22:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)