Talk:dinilchííʼ

Etyl
Isn't this basically dini- + ? -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 18:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes. —Stephen (Talk) 04:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * This is something I've wanted to bring up, actually--I've been breaking down prefix complexes like dini- into their components, but maybe I shouldn't for particularly common ones. Something for Wiktionary Talk:About Navajo? Ewweisser (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Possibly, yes (for WT:ANV). Generally speaking, my sense is that any common prefix combination that has taken on an idiomatic meaning might want to be presented as a discrete unit, with the individual component prefixes given on the entry page for that unit.  For instance, I've noticed  +  is described in a couple books as inceptive  + terminative, together meaning that the prefixed verb is in the act of beginning to happen.  (From that interpretation, I took  to mean "to begin to redden" -> "to be pink" [assuming the base state was white].)  This  could thus be viewed as an idiomatic prefix combo, and might warrant having its own entry page.  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)