Talk:dizamos

dizamos
"Dizamos" doesn't seem to be a legitimate conjugation of "dizer"; Portuguese Wiktionary lists the first-person affirmative imperative as "digamos", not "dizamos". A quick search online shows just a little over 2,400 results. You may see this, this, and this for more. (under imperativo → nós) The Obento Musubi (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , just to make sure that there isn't something weird or dialectal that could be going on. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn’t look like it’s attested even in dialect or nonstandard text. All but one of the Google Books hits are typos of and scannos of . — Ungoliant (falai) 14:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Abstain. gives me the following attestations:, , , , and more. Therefore, the form appears attested.  gives 3,300 hits. It is an inflected form, with low absolute number of hits, so, despite the favorable frequency ratio, I do not know whether this should be kept as a common misspelling; probably not. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The four hits you listed above are in Spanish, not Portuguese. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 15:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)