Talk:does one

This should probably be cleaned up and co-ordinated with the explanation of the auxiliary verb at do.

See Requests for deletion for details. Eclecticology 08:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

does one
The comment, even in May of 08, was: "Was RFCed a while ago, never cleaned. Formatting is crap." — Beobach 00:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Good now? &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes! Thank you! :) — Beobach 23:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

has one
SOP: does + one. '''Replace with. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, these belong a well-written grammatical appendix on question tags --Elemmemm 22:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Three old discussions are at [[Wiktionary:Tea room/2009/July]], [[Wiktionary:Tea room/2006]], and [[Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Archives/2006/02]], which latter was closed with, if anything, a consensus to delete (but mention at [[do]]). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note that we can collect and keep translations of tag questions (and presumably any other pertinent information) at innit and, if we add the sense(!), at right. — Beobach 22:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Remove all skeletons from my closet. DAVilla 08:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I like the appendix idea, not only for simplicity and neatness, but also because I think it's the most user-friendly solution. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not being clear. Sure, I wasn't opposed to that idea. DAVilla 17:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Appendicized. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The appendix already exists. See Appendix:English tag questions -- A LGRIF  talk 20:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)