Talk:donaldtrumpi

RFV discussion: July 2020
Rfv-senses:



The taxonomic names exist. The question is whether the specific epithet alone is used to refer to them. DCDuring (talk) 03:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedied. Clearly not citable, as it's hard to say whether something like is even citable as a whole, and use of a bare specific epithet to refer to a species in print is both nonstandard and highly unusual. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * What's the rush? The contributor can struggle to cite them and maybe learn something. Hell, we might learn something. DCDuring (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think that anon will even notice this discussion. If you ever try helping with clearing out this page, you'll understand why I prefer to speedy something I would have shot on sight had I seen the edit when it was first made. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't have the expertise to do much on this page and don't have skin thick enough to try. I'd have been happy to have looked at this in 30 days. DCDuring (talk) 06:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)