Talk:done done

RFV discussion
Either a protologism or a neologism, and is sufficiently jargony/slangy I'd prefer to see it cited. — Carolina wren discussió 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It sounds like contrastive focus reduplication rather than an actual term of the sort we include. (But, I could be wrong. It's possible that it's a fixed term that simply originated as contrastive focus reduplication.) —Ruakh TALK 16:19, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 02:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)