Talk:double-clean

RFV discussion: October–December 2022
"(typography, very rare) A type of bold font." Equinox ◑ 11:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Our friend was inferring this from the synonyms list at but somehow came up with this interesting definition. I would speedy it, but I see that that was turned down already... This, that and the other (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The word seems marginal in any case. Pariah S. Burke's Mastering InDesign CS5 for Print Design and Production says: "Fully justified text can be referred as such, or as flush left and right, just plain flush, forced, forced justified, no rag, and, just once by a New Zealander, double-clean type." (Who, where?) Equinox ◑ 13:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can see it in use here, which is written in a way that assumes the reader knows what "a double clean bold and monoline script plus and a casual sans serif typeface" is. I suspect that's why the IP inferred that it refers to a boldface, too, but to me that line just reads like a bunch of descriptors in a list that doesn't have commas. On a related note, it shows the block was warranted, as you have to be pretty clueless to see this listed as a synonym of only to define it as a synonym of  based on a misinterpretation of a single Pinterest listing... Theknightwho (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I remember Luciferwildcat once giving an obscure word a completely wrong def because he'd found a quiz book saying "does this word mean (a) ... (b) ... (c) ..." and he just picked one. Unbelievable! Equinox ◑ 08:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 01:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)