Talk:double entendre

double entendre
Rfv-sense: plural. —Ruakh TALK 16:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Please take a look at the cites. DCDuring TALK 20:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * They look sound, especially the latter two; thanks. In your opinion, is "double entendre" in standard plural use? —Ruakh TALK 20:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I am not convinced by the citations. The first one is using the word as a word (as one might say "the kind of joke usually labelled pun"), and I believe the other two are using it as a mass noun. Equinox 21:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not at all certain, but the cites shown are all I could find at b.g.c. It certainly seems non-standard, not terribly common, and possibly interpretable as a mass noun per Equinox. DCDuring TALK 22:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Alternative explanation: there have been three writers (so far) who did not know the plural of "double entendre". --Hekaheka 04:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

RFV passed, kept as nonstandard. Thanks, DCDuring. —Ruakh TALK 20:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Example
I heard the example as, "A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double entendre, so the barman gives her one". Not sure if the expression "give her one" is more of a British term, but to me this version is funnier. 208.81.28.208

Might English plural forms include doubles entendre and/or doubles entendres?
So, which is the correct pluralisation? allixpeeke (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC) P. S. The term doubles entendres appears on this Oxford Living Dictionary page, while this Oxford Living Dictionary page refers to double entendres.
 * Sources for doubles entendre by year: 1847, 1884, 1997, 2010, 2012
 * Sources for doubles entendres by year: 1790, 1816, 1866, 1874, 1882, 1883, 1885, 2003, 2013–2017, 2015, 2017