Talk:drivellous

RFV discussion: August 2015–January 2016
Does this meet WT:ATTEST? The entry now has two quotations, of which "2008, Author: penfold" is not in permanently recorded media. Searches:. Oops; the Usenet search suggests it is attested, but is the definition accurate? For instance, "your argument is drivellous" does not suggest "your argument is talkative" to me but rather "your argument is very bad", of or pertaining to drivel--senseless talk; nonsense. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note we have also drivelous; . --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merged into drivelous. Thanks. Yurivict (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV resolved. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)