Talk:ducentesimal

RFV discussion: May–June 2023
Only one verifiable citation. "Category:en:Two hundred" does not exist here or on Wikipedia. The pages two hundred here and Two hundred on Wikipedia do exist, but do not mention "ducentesimal". The MLA listserv has the comment, 'Google finds what seems to be one occurrence in the Atlantic Monthly of 1858'. There need to be three verifiable RS citations in this page's "Citations" tab. – .Raven (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Verifiability issues are handled at Requests for verification. Do you mind if I move it there? J3133 (talk) 10:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem! - .Raven (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

RFV-failed, converted to no entry (although perhaps should be deleted outright, as the most recent use - the only one, indeed - is not recent). This, that and the other (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)