Talk:eß

RFV discussion: May 2018–April 2019
Entered by new user, replaced with by  without a given reason.__Gamren (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Special:Contributions/Asdfqwertypkfynzsgj doesn't inspire confidence. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 17:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Is at least attestable with mentionings, even with mentionings in younger or 'modern' linguistic sources (WT:CFI permits mentionings for LDLs, Bavarian is n LDL), e.g., , ( gives it with dual meaning). However, in contrary to other spellings, I saw no usage of this spelling - but that doesn't mean anything and eß could have been used in a dialectal modern (post-1900) source. -84.161.38.239 22:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

öß
Entered by new user, replaced with by  without a given reason.__Gamren (talk) 12:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Is attestable. books.google.com/books?id=_SRoAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA348 with a text from Tirol: "So löbt dönn wohl, öß griana Waada!" with translations öß = ihr, Waada = Weiden. However, this doesn't attest the label. BTW 1: Text also has önk = euch, mar = wir. BTW 2: "öß" does also mean "is" in some (other German) dialects. BTW 3: There are also mentionings like books.google.com/books?id=UK9TAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA75, which, if refering to a Bavarian dialect, would be sufficient as Bavarian is an LDL. BTW 4: See also ös, es. -00:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Is attested. -84.161.38.239 22:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * RFV passed for both entries. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 15:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)