Talk:e-ojn

RFC discussion: August–October 2016
Definition-line needs to be templatized. - -sche (discuss) 17:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * As far as I can tell, Template:eo-form of does not seem to be capable of handling this entry. If it is, the documentation page doesn't indicate how. a-oj, a-on, a-ojn, e-oj, e-on, i-oj, i-on, i-ojn, u-oj, u-on, and u-ojn also seem to have this problem. Pinging User:Kc kennylau, User:CodeCat, and User:Yair rand, who have significantly edited the template. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 21:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * : Done. --kc_kennylau (talk) 09:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - -sche (discuss) 10:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)