Talk:economic embargo

economic embargo
Pretty clear SOP; see Talk:economic blockade for a related but slightly more unclear case that eventually failed RFD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Both economic blockade and economic embargo are idioms that are often used in both the news and literature. Unfortunately, this Metanoknowledge has gone through my User page and flagged four entries for deletion.  My often asked question is why does Wiktionary allow these douche bags to have admin powers?  WritersCramp (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. WritersCramp only wants to keep the entry because he created it, not because of its merits. Often being used in news and literature are not relevant factors - so is black car. It should be deleted because it fails WT:CFI as is easily derived from the sum of its parts. If you know what economic and embargo mean, you know what an economic embargo is. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Merits of this entry aside, it's quite reasonable, when one sees one problematic entry, to look at the user's contributions to see if there's a pattern of creating similar problem entries- which there has been for years in your case. Fortunately, other people can see what you're obviously blind to, and you help things along by spewing out mindless, rabid nastiness like the above that shifts the focus from the entries to your misbehavior. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 21:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; an embargo that is economic. bd2412 T 14:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Encyclopedic topic. --Romanophile (talk) 23:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Re: "encyclopedic topic": so is economics. Thus, a non-rationale. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Leave me alone. --Romanophile (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)