Talk:eigenaard

Do you think this could be a backformation from. Eigenaardig is well attested since the 18th century, but eigenaard becomes common in the late 19th century (maybe it's attested a little earlier). ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  16:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That makes sense for me seen the time gap between the attestations. On the other hand, if we don't have sources, we don't know for sure, so I suppose it warrants the "likely" or "possibly" qualifier. Morgengave (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It just occurred to me that there might be a rival hypothesis if a German counterpart exists, after all is a calque from German, and lo  exists. Shall I take it to the ES? ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  17:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, you are right! Yes, good idea! Morgengave (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)