Talk:eksvirkato

RFV discussion: July–September 2017
__Gamren (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Why are you adding a regularly formed, uncontroversial Esperanto word to RFV? Ligata (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Because we're a descriptive dictionary- we describe usage. No usage, no entry. See WT:CFI. If it's used, as documented in sources that CFI accepts, it will pass rfv. Chuck Entz (talk) 16:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It's still nice to provide more of a description than "__", maybe stating whether a Google Books search or Google Groups search has been done.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)