Talk:emptor

RFV discussion: July–August 2023
Is this actually in use in English? I tried looking for "the emptor is", "the emptor should", "emptors are", but could not find anything compelling. PUC – 11:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Some uses:, , . --Lambiam 15:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * OED actually has 7 cites. Here are some more in the collocations "vendor and emptor" and "vendors and emptors":, , , , . Here's one more: . Upon a cursory look these, OED's cites, and Lambiam's cites are all independent. 蒼鳥 fawk. tell me if i did anything wrong. 01:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * RFV passed, although citations have not been added. Pious Eterino (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)