Talk:eng

Request for verification
Rfv-sense: abbreviation, in English, in lowercase, for "English" and "England". Note the ISO code is already covered under ==Translingual==. -- Visviva 10:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How about rfd-redundant then? I mean it exists in English doesn't it? So it needs an rfd not an rfv right? Mglovesfun (talk) 06:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I assumed the definition was claiming that an English abbreviation existed independently of ISO -- that, say, in older dictionaries or somewhere "English" might be denoted as "eng(.)" rather than "Eng(.)" Even if that isn't what was meant, it seems plausible enough to be worth an RFV. -- Visviva 07:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, section removed. —Ruakh TALK 01:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)