Talk:engage

Misplaced diæresis
Surely the 1895 citation for sense № 7, “American Students at the Naples Zöological Station” ought correctly to be written “American Students at the Naples Zoölogical Station”… –or is this the way it was actually written? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 01:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Mea culpa. Now fixed, thanks. —Ruakh TALK 02:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. Pædantry’s a useful thing from time to time… :) †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 02:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

engage
17 senses? --Connel MacKenzie 19:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * (— Beobach 08:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC))
 * Reduced to 8 senses, two of which are RFV'd. Moglex 20:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * ?? Did you forget to save your changes, or something? —Ruakh TALK 22:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Evidently. (Arrrgggghhhh). Moglex 08:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it's clean now. — Beobach 08:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

betroth?
is betroth a synonym to engage?