Talk:enspection

RFD discussion: October 2016–May 2017
A 2011 rare misspelling entry by Romanophile. Governed by WT:CFI.

does not even find the spelling so no frequency ratio = count(inspection) /count(enspection) can be determined. Delete. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I suppose this should be an RFV. I recently changed it to a misspelling while checking plurals etc. I think Romanophile created a ton of en- forms for in- words at some stage and they might not all be legitimate. Equinox ◑ 10:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should just keep it as obsolete spelling like these two: enform, entention. All three are mentioned in this source . --Hekaheka (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

No consensus to delete. Closed without prejudice to the opening of an RfV. bd2412 T 12:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)