Talk:equivalent-teeth shrew mole

RFV discussion: July–August 2022
This common name was evidently coined by the Chinese authors of the original 2013 description of the species, and was used as the title of the Wikipedia page. Everything else I can find on Google seems to be repackaged Wikipedia. This is an insignificant, geographically remote cryptic species that required DNA analysis to distinguish from its sister species, and the name is awkwardly sesquipedalian. As a consequence, I have my doubts as to whether this name has caught on, or ever will catch on in actual usage (as opposed to regurgitation of someone else's free content). Chuck Entz (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * One cite on citations page. I think this should become a no entry. This, that and the other (talk) 03:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)