Talk:er voor spek en bonen bijstaan

RFD discussion: April–September 2017
See above, +. — Kleio (t · c) 18:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Btw, should entries like geen kind hebben aan and geen boodschap hebben aan be with or without the aan? — Kleio (t · c) 18:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Can they ever be used without? —CodeCat 18:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's sometimes used with as well, though  is more common (by far). Saying it without either does sound unnatural. — Kleio (t · c) 18:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess one could be called an alternative form of another, but I'm not sure what the usual practice is. Ask in BP maybe? —CodeCat 18:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I would include the aan and mention an alternative form if required. voor doesn't sound too natural to me either, so I'm not adding it. W3ird N3rd (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. voor spek en bonen can be used in various combinations and this is not even a common one. W3ird N3rd (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Examples: meedoen voor spek en bonen (participating), werken voor spek en bonen (working), ik ben voor spek en bonen op komen dagen. (I showed up for nothing) There really is nothing special about bijstaan. W3ird N3rd (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)