Talk:esthetic information

RFV discussion: March 2018–February 2023
English. Strange entry that hasn't been touched by humans in 10 years. —suzukaze (t・c) 02:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure whether to send to RFV or RFD. Seems to be a coinage by someone called Abraham Moles, normally found in opposition to : see . This, that and the other (talk) 10:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If it is citable it seems includable to me, so I've moved this discussion to RFV. &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 18:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Cited and cleaned up, with a better gloss. It's used very widely in some corners of design and social science, well beyond the "advertising" context that was originally given at the entry. The spelling with "esthetic" looks far less common than "aesthetic" though, so I would probably move it to aesthetic information. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * RFV-passed. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 04:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)