Talk:f*der

Request for deletion
We're certainly not short on things in Portuguese (or any language) that actually need doing. — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 03:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * How is this any different than f**k? Nadando 03:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * If it were up to me, we wouldn't have that either. — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 23:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm struggling to find a reason to delete it. If you see you're unlikely to know what it means, so that's a reason to look it up. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you often read Portuguese? — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 13:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


 * No, do you? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, it it can be cited to meet WT:CFI. I've found that in some older English texts, items like this sometimes appear that leave me initially baffled when I read them.  If you came across "br—h" (which I can cite), would you have the slightest clue what it meant?  Ideas about what words are obscene change over time, and so do the euphemistic forms.  --EncycloPetey 04:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as with f**k and per EP. What's br—h, by the way, EP? (Guess: breech.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ 23:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. You can see the quote in question on the entry for . --EncycloPetey 23:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Kept. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 16:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)