Talk:fag enabler

Request for verification
Tagged for speedy deletion as a "attack page" which seems like nonsense to me. Who is it supposed to be attacking? Anyway, RFV seemed the only plausible option, as the page does like a bit dodgy. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the foul language but...I could be wrong although at best this seems to be fucking WBC bullshit. Try bgc maybe? 50 Xylophone Players talk 21:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The only Google Books match is quoting Phelps (of the WBC). I looked on Google Groups and found a rather small number of uses, mostly again quoting him or in reference to WBC stuff. So my hunch is that this hasn't spread enough to be properly citable. Equinox ◑ 21:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not making a comment on the content, I'm just asking is it attestable? FWIW I can't guess the meaning from fag + enabler. If this fails, fag-enabler should go too. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 19:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)